This website is accessible to all versions of every browser. However, you are seeing this message because your browser does not support basic Web standards, and does not properly display the site's design details. Please consider upgrading to a more modern browser. (Learn More).

You are here: home > opinion > one on one

New lessons from old wars

By D. G. Martin
Posted Monday, September 22, 2014

e-mail E-mail this page   print Printer-friendly page

Chapel Hill, NC - At the end of a two-day conference about World War I at UNC Chapel Hill, I asked a leading military historian what approach he would recommend to the United States to deal with the challenge of ISIS.

I will tell you about his response in a minute.

The World War I conference was one of a series of planned events to commemorate the 100th anniversary of that Great War and to learn what lessons might help us deal with present day challenges.

There are plenty of lessons, according to the series coordinator, UNC-CH’s Institute for the Arts and Humanities. “World War I exerted enormous influence on domestic and foreign policy, literally reshaping international trade, military science, gender and work roles and creating enduring nation states.”

But with our country at the beginning of another war, what about guidance that could help us avoid the mistakes World War I participants made?

For instance, all the combating countries, especially the Germans, counted on a short war. The Germans thought they could quickly defeat France as they had done less than 50 years earlier. Then, they would apply their full strength against Russia, defeat that country and take the leading role in Europe.

But there was no quick victory.

The French, with their British allies, and the help of a late push from the Americans, stopped the German war machine. The four years of trench warfare that followed wore Germany down to a humiliating loss.

The lesson: Plans and hopes for quick endings of any sort are often dashed. America’s recent military experiences reinforce this lesson.

Notwithstanding initial patriotic enthusiasm and support, by the end of World War I popular uprisings toppled the governments of Germany, Austria, and Russia.

Even in the United States, the same voters who solidly re-elected Woodrow Wilson in 1916 handed his party a crushing defeat in the congressional elections in November 1918, the same month the war ended.

The lesson: Leaders taking their countries to war must be prepared to accept humiliating defeats administered by the people at home.

What advice, then, could a British military historian give to help the U.S. respond to the ISIS challenge?

“Do like we did with the Mahdi,” he told me.

I asked him what he meant.

“Go in and wipe them out, and then go home.”

This advice made sense in a way. With its trained forces, modern weapons and air power, the U.S. has capability to destroy the massed forces of ISIS on the desert battlefield. But the U.S. has not shown that it can find and destroy scattered, motivated enemy fighters in complicated terrain or urban settings.

So the historian’s advice made sense. It made sense until I read a little more about the Mahdi.

Here is a summary of what I learned. In the 1870s, Egypt, which ruled the Sudan, was coming under British control. Meanwhile, a Muslim cleric, the Mahdi, proclaimed himself redeemer of the Islamic world and began a rebellion against the Egyptians. His armies slaughtered the Egyptian forces. When Britain sent its own troops to confront the Mahdi, the result was a disaster for the British, a complete defeat and massacre at Khartoum in 1885.

Surely the historian was not suggesting this pathway to deal with ISIS.

Later, however, in 1898, the British sent a stronger force with modern weapons. It confronted the Mahdist army and destroyed it.

“But,” I had asked the historian, “did the British actually go home after the victory?”

“They did,” he said. “But then they came back, and that was a mistake.”

A final lesson comes from New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman, who recently wrote, “There are three things in life that you should never do ambivalently: get married, buy a house or go to war. Alas, we’re about to do No. 3.”


----------------------------------

D.G. Martin hosts “North Carolina Bookwatch,” which airs Sundays at noon and Thursdays at 5 p.m. on UNC-TV. For more information or to view prior programs visit the webpage at www.unctv.org/ncbookwatch.

 
e-mail E-mail this page
print Printer-friendly page
 
 
 
New lessons from old wars

Related info:
NC Book Watch

Our State magazine
Latest articles in One on One
 
North Carolina and the U.S. – Mexico border
 
Four good North Carolina books for the spring
 
North Carolina’s last liberal
 
"Most moderate" and Kay
 
New lessons from old wars
 
A non-lawyer on the Supreme Court?
 
Is it that bad?
 
 
Music, murder and more for your summer reading
 
The Republicans’ best choice for 2016
 
The South is a dilemma for both parties
 
Would a Shirley Temple help?
 
Saying thanks is not enough
 
North Carolina is 'Variety Literatureland'
 
 
 
Opinion

Got Feedback?
Send a letter to the editor.

Subscribe
Sign up for the Chatham Chatlist. Find out what your friends and neighbors are saying about what's going on in Chatham County.

Advertise
Promote your business at chathamjournal.com

Subscribe now: RSS news feed, plus FREE headlines for your site