This website is accessible to all versions of every browser. However, you are seeing this message because your browser does not support basic Web standards, and does not properly display the site's design details. Please consider upgrading to a more modern browser. (Learn More).

You are here: home > news > state

Now, could you kindly please not destroy any of the evidence?

Posted Thursday, April 3, 2014

e-mail E-mail this page   print Printer-friendly page

Raleigh, NC – In response to yesterdays’ stunning Board of Elections disclosure of up to 36,515 voters suspected of committing felony election fraud, the Voter Integrity Project of NC, today asked Kim Strach and the state’s Legislature to enact emergency legislation that will prevent counties from destroying a critical piece of evidence.

“Every North Carolina voter signs an Authorization to Vote or ATV form before they were handed a ballot,” said Jay DeLancy, Executive Director of VIP-NC, “but unless those forms are subpoenaed, state record keeping laws will allow election officials to destroy this evidence in a few short months.”

According to Standard 8, Table 13 of Record Retention and Disposition Schedule for the County Board of Elections (linked here), the ATV form used in any Federal election is retained for 22 months, while local and municipal election forms are only retained for two months, making fraud investigations for local races even more challenging.

“Unless the Legislature acts quickly to change state record-keeping law, a great deal of evidence that could help prove organized election fraud during the 2012 election will be destroyed very soon,” he said.

VIP-NC wants the Legislature to change the record keeping law and require the ATVs to be scanned and permanently stored in each voter’s record, as is the current law for a voter’s registration form.

“Unless a Prosecutor somehow can obtain a signed confession from someone suspected of vote fraud,” he said, “those signed ATVs are the strongest piece of evidence a Prosecutor could ever have. Without it, there’s no case.”

According to DeLancy, District Attorneys rarely prosecute individuals referred to them for vote fraud. In 2013, the group earned national media coverage after providing the evidence that resulted in the State Board Elections making criminal referrals against five double voters from 2012 election.

No District Attorneys have prosecuted the cases, but the group used the news story to pressure Legislators to join the multistate consortium (called “Interstate Crosscheck) which resulted in yesterday’s announcement of massive vote fraud in North Carolina. .

“One of the convenient excuses that Prosecutors have for ignoring vote fraud involves this quiet little evidence destruction policy,” he said. “Now that we’ve uncovered it, we hope Legislators will require long-term retention.”

The 36,515 North Carolina voters, suspected of fraud by voting twice in the same federal election all had matching first names, last names and DOB. Contained within that group 765 also had a last four of their SSN match. All are being investigated for voting in North Carolina and one other state.

“This is one tip of just one iceberg,” said DeLancy. “It shows one single type of election fraud has happened in one election, but without a modern record retention policy, we will never learn exactly how much other vote fraud has been happening in our state.”

 
e-mail E-mail this page
print Printer-friendly page
 
 
 
News

Free Classifieds

Got Feedback?
Send a letter to the editor.

Subscribe
Sign up for the Chatham Chatlist.

Advertise
Promote your brand at chathamjournal.com





Google
ChathamJournal Web



Subscribe now: RSS news feed, plus FREE headlines for your site